Several weeks ago, I had
the opportunity to attend a debate between creationist Jay Wile (PhD nuclear
chemistry) and evolutionist Robert A. Martin (PhD zoology). I was
absolutely amazed at the depth of evidence, or rather I should say lack
thereof, presented by the evolutionist. Allow me to impress you with an
example.
Early in his talk, the
evolutionist promised that we would get to “lots of evidence” for how we can know that certain rocks are 65
million years old. Along with the rest of the audience, I waited in
anticipation.
This Is It!
When he finally got to it,
I was astounded. Keep in mind that he had come prepared, with printed
slides. Are you ready for this? Here is what was printed on
one of his slides:
“We have put a rover on Mars;
how difficult do you think it is to date a rock?”
No kidding; that was it—the
irrefutable evidence we had waited for—his brilliant “lots of evidence” technical
explanation for the reliability of geologic column dates.
But he didn’t stop
there. No, he skillfully further reinforced his position with this dazzling
zinger:
“These dates are basically right.
Sophisticated labs are doing this; it’s not hard.”
We waited all night for
more substance, but he offered none. In all honestly, he was genuinely
pitiable; I’m not sure Dr. Martin even realized the audience was underwhelmed.
Evolution's Finest?
If that is all that the
evolutionists have to offer, I’m not convinced we should dignify this
sort of dialogue by calling it a debate at all. Real debates feature logical arguments—backed by evidence—from
both sides. However, in this particular dialogue, the logical arguments and actual evidence were all on the side of the
creationist Dr. Wile, who, in the case of the aforementioned topic, pointed out
numerous examples of where dates assigned by various methods are not in
agreement.
And so it went for the
entire night. The creationist gave
example after example supporting his positions, and, unlike the evolutionist, the
creationist included the citations for his evidence, which in several cases
came straight from peer-reviewed articles authored by evolutionists.
The evolutionist, on the
other hand, employed sarcasm, cartoons--yes, cartoons, and bullying insults to make his
points, accusing audience members, including myself and other fellow college
graduates from scientific fields, of never having read anything but our
Bibles. He tried to bolster his position by insisting that educated people no longer question these things. Throughout the entire evening, he conducted himself as though extreme
confidence in his position completely negated the need for any evidence.
Honestly, I had actually expected
some real clash in this match-up, but I was seriously disappointed; the
evolutionist’s arrogant disregard for logic and evidence made a complete
mockery of scientific inquiry.
Don't Be Intimidated
Fellow parents, even
assuming that evolutionists exist who are more convincing than Dr. Martin
(though my university biology professors were not), we have no reason whatsoever to shy away from the issue of origins. And in fact, we should be addressing
the issue of origins head on. Dig
in together with your children to examine the evidence. Recognize and question the
presuppositions. Scrutinize and evaluate
the bold claims. Teach your
children to think critically and logically by engaging in discussion with them.
"Do you not know? Have you not heard?
The Everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth
does not become weary or tired.
His understanding is inscrutable."
Isaiah 40:28
Isaiah 40:28
Not only that, but He never loses a debate.
Scripture quotations taken from the NASB.
A homeschool mom since 2001, Carol is a passionate encourager and loves using creative means to do it--including blogging, speaking, writing music, and singing. Her blog, called Unsmotherable Delight (udelight.blogspot.com), is where you'll find musings and music to encourage your faith and lift your spirit. Her original 'theme song' titled Captain's Anthem can also be heard on Vimeo at http://vimeo.com/30769152.
Scripture quotations taken from the NASB.
No comments:
Post a Comment